Not that I can recall. But I do agree that it is at minimum redundant
and probably just wrong to have R-version requirements for BioC packages.
And seriously? 500 packages? I find that surprising.
Best,
Jim
On 5/21/2013 11:38 AM, Martin Morgan wrote:
Pulling this over to Bioc-devel. It's tempting to strip this from the
DESCRIPTION files of the ~500 packages that include it. It's not
useful in the context of the Bioconductor release schedule, and makes
a forward promise that cannot be guaranteed.
Is this something that has come up before?
Martin
On 05/21/2013 08:28 AM, James W. MacDonald wrote:
It does say R >= 2.15.2 in the Depends, which is misleading.
--
James W. MacDonald, M.S.
Biostatistician
University of Washington
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences
4225 Roosevelt Way NE, # 100
Seattle WA 98105-6099
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
