Hi, On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 11:47 -0400, James W. MacDonald wrote: > Not that I can recall. But I do agree that it is at minimum redundant > and probably just wrong to have R-version requirements for BioC packages.
I'd like to disagree. BioC *promises* that stuff works together at a certain point in time, simply because that stuff was green at the build farm at that time. But what should keep me as a developer from promising that my stuff also works on older releases ? (For the fun of it, I once bisected R versions to find a minimal R version for xcms ...). So why shouldn't I declare that xcms still runs on R-2.14.0 ? I can R CMD check it there, and if someone knows what he does, he can bypass biocLite() and install the latest from SVN manually. If I *know* xcms won't work reliably with R-2.13 and older, then omitting "Depends: R (>= 2.14.0)" means that someone with an old cluster (which oftentimes receives fewer upgrades than your average laptop) with venerable R-2.10.0 fill fail *at some time* rather than on install time. Just my 2c. Yours, Steffen -- IPB Halle AG Massenspektrometrie & Bioinformatik Dr. Steffen Neumann http://www.IPB-Halle.DE Weinberg 3 http://msbi.bic-gh.de 06120 Halle Tel. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1470 +49 (0) 345 5582 - 0 sneumann(at)IPB-Halle.DE Fax. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1409 _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
