My confusion is total. Suppose a package gets build (no errors) but fails check (error) and gets a version bump. Does the package source then get propagated to the web/repository?
Best, Kasper On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Dan Tenenbaum <dtene...@fhcrc.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Kasper Daniel Hansen > <kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So this thread is good for my follow up question. > > > > I am setting up a Windows box to test/fix bumphunter (newest version > 1.1.7) > > which has been broken (R CMD check) for a while, especially on Windows. > > > > This page (bottom) > > http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.13/bioc/html/bumphunter.html > > suggests that the latest binary version for Windows is 1.1.0 which is > also > > probably the last time it build and checked properly. So this all > reflects > > my expectations of not being able to get a binary version newer than > 1.1.0 > > > > However, when I install R-3.0.1 under windows, source biocLite and do > > useDevel(TRUE) (getting BiocInstaller version 1.11.3) and then do > > biocLite("bumphunter") > > I get version 1.1.7. Why? I am asking for binary versions and nor > source. > > > > The website wasn't being updated due to an unrelated issue. Fixed now. > Dan > > > > Best, > > Kasper > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Dan Tenenbaum <dtene...@fhcrc.org> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Sunday, June 30, 2013, Kasper Daniel Hansen > >> <kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Doesn't this mean that the issue Wolfgang discusses only arises when > >> > people install from subversion? > >> > >> Yes. > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> > Kasper > >> > > >> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Martin Morgan <mtmor...@fhcrc.org> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 06/30/2013 03:32 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> On Jun 30, 2013 12:43 PM, "Kasper Daniel Hansen" < > >> >>> kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Also, as far as I understand, the package does not get build using > >> >>>> the new > >> >>>> commit, if it has already been build with that version number > before. > >> >>> > >> >>> The package is built but not propagated to the web/repository. This > >> >>> "feature" allows developers to check that their changes get built by > >> >>> the > >> >> > >> >> It's more a safety measure -- if the developer FORGETS to bump, then > at > >> >> least we are not distributing two implementations under the same > version > >> >> number. > >> >> > >> >> As Wolfgang says, version numbers are free so no need to hold back on > >> >> their use. > >> >> > >> >> Martin > >> >> > >> >>> build system, but yes, once you're satisfied that things work, you > >> >>> should > >> >>> bump the version number to propagate the package and avoid the > >> >>> confusion > >> >>> Wolfgang describes. > >> >>> > >> >>> Dan > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Best, > >> >>>> Kasper > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Wolfgang Huber <whu...@embl.de> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Hi All, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> just a reminder that it is good practice to bump up the package > >> >>>>> version > >> >>>>> when you commit a change to a package's source, even if you > consider > >> >>>>> it > >> >>>>> 'trivial'. Version numbers are free, while the confusion ensuing > >> >>>>> from > >> >>> > >> >>> there > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> being different versions of the software with ostensibly the same > >> >>> > >> >>> version > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> can waste a great deal of someone's time. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Dan / Bioc-Core team: would it be good to mention this somewhere > on > >> >>>>> http://bioconductor.org/developers/source-control ? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Best wishes > >> >>>>> Wolfgang > >> >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>>>> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > >> >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > >> >>>> > >> >>>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>>> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > >> >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > >> >>> > >> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > >> >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center > >> >> 1100 Fairview Ave. N. > >> >> PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109 > >> >> > >> >> Location: Arnold Building M1 B861 > >> >> Phone: (206) 667-2793 > >> > > >> > > > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
