Hi Vince,
My dumb mistake, sorry. Now fixed, version 0.99.9,
https://github.com/paul-shannon/IGV
I’m looking forward to hearing your suggestions.
- Paul
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Vincent Carey <st...@channing.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul -- I am trying to build your vignette but it has
>
> load("~/s/work/priceLab/AD/tbl.gwas.level_1.RData")
>
> I think it should be possible to get your package through
> check, but I would like to get the vignette built and
> check out the tests before commenting further.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Paul Shannon
> <paul.thurmond.shan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "Once your package builds and checks without errors or (avoidable)
> > warnings, a Bioconductor team member will provide a technical review of
> > your package. Other Bioconductor developers and users with domain expertise
> > are encouraged to provide additional community commentary. Reviewers will
> > add comments to the issue you created.”
>
> I don’t believe my submission, IGV, quite fits the mold. As best I can tell,
> no web browser can be summoned on any of the architectures by IGV during
> build or check. So the package build always times out. And so, according to
> the guideline quoted above, it will never be reviewed!
>
> IGV is a BrowserViz version >=2 subclass; BrowserViz was recently uprev’d in
> devel. Like RCyjs, IGV's raison d’être is the provision of R access to
> interactive graphics in your web browser, in this case to Jim Robinson’s
> igv.js.
>
> My analysis may be incorrect. Can this matter receive a little attention,
> despite the bioc submission guideline quoted above, in hopes that the package
> can move forward?
>
> Thank you,
>
> - Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
