Christian Hoener zu Siederdissen <choe...@tbi.univie.ac.at> writes: > isn't the new binary-0.7 lazy again or allows laziness? If you could > update to 0.7 with laziness that would be of great use. Maybe Soenke's > patch already allows laziness?
I must admit I hadn't followed this closely lately. Last I heard was that you needed to use the solution I use in biosff, but if anybody wants to experiment with it, the canonical benchmark is to just run (the included) flower; e.g. time flower -s somefile.sff > /dev/null I'm not going to spend a lot of time on biolib, since I think it is a bit of a dead end. I did have a half-baked version that simply imported and reexported the other libraries, but due to some data structure changes, I shelved it. -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Biohaskell mailing list Biohaskell@biohaskell.org http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell
