You do realize that many of the other classes in biojava are 1 based rather
than 0 based. Lets keep one standard, I don't care which. Having some
functions 1 based and some 0 based will drive many insane, in fact I've
already lost a developer to the current standard being 1 based :).
-Robin
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Schreiber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Hilmar Lapp
Cc: Schreiber, Mark; biojava-l (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface
I agree, 0..2 is more in keeping with other bioinformatics standards.
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
>
> --- "Schreiber, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > Below is a work up for a possible FramedFeature interface
> >
> > Any comments?
> >
> Just a note for the integer codes: Bioperl as well as many other
> bioinformatics applications use frames [+/-]0..2 instead of 1..3.
>
> -hilmar
>
> =====
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Hilmar Lapp email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121 phone: +1-858-812-1757
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo!
Messenger
> http://im.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mark Schreiber Ph: 64 3 4797875
Rm 218 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Biochemistry email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Otago
PO Box 56
Dunedin
New Zealand
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
