RE: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface

[Ewan Birney]

On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Emig, Robin wrote:

> You do realize that many of the other classes in biojava are 1 based rather
> than 0 based. Lets keep one standard, I don't care which. Having some
> functions 1 based and some 0 based will drive many insane, in fact I've
> already lost a developer to the current standard being 1 based :).
> -Robin
>

This is not the 1/0 start position dichotomy, but the frame/phase
definition. 0,1,2 is the most common convention.


_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l