Matthew Pocock wrote: > > Does any of this tally with other peoples thoughts? > I agree with keeping strand and frame separate properties. Would also be consistent with Bioperl and other friends. -hilmar -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Hilmar Lapp email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121 phone: +1-858-812-1757 ------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
- RE: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Ewan Birney
- RE: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Emig, Robin
- RE: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface David Huen
- Re: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Simon Brocklehurst
- Re: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Thomas Down
- RE: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Ewan Birney
- RE: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Mark Schreiber
- RE: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Eric Blossom
- Re: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Matthew Pocock
- Re: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Mark Schreiber
- Re: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Hilmar Lapp
- Re: [Biojava-l] FramedFeature interface Matthew Pocock