Hi - On the whole biojavax supports more formats and has a more detailed object model. The parsers are generally more reliable but sometimes a little strict about modifications to a format.
We are currently trying to do some stress testing of format reading. In the most current CVS release I have added more informative exception statements that make it easier to debug parsing issues. - Mark On 3/26/07, Sofia Burvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently updating some code that require biojava. I am > interested in having as many sequence formats as possible supported > and I want it to be stable. I was wondering if there are any > differences between biojava and biojavax in those aspects? > > Thank you > /Sofia > _______________________________________________ > Biojava-l mailing list - [email protected] > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l > _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
