On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:02:54PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote: > I *think* that you are referring to the body of yyparse, but I'm > talking about the name of the function only. I am by no means > referring to the code of the yyparse function, but merely the *name*. > > When the push features are enabled, rename what used to be yyparse > into something else (using m4), and provide a wrapper named yyparse > that calls repeatedly the push interface. > > Am I clear?
Yes! This is clear, and I like the idea. Do you like the name yypushparse ()? Now, one last issue I'd like to resolve before posting the newest patch. How should I handle the %parse-param option in %push-parser mode? Should the yyparse () function and the yypushparse () function both accept the %parse-param arguments? Thanks, Bob Rossi
