On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:44:00PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote: > Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Honestly, I don't understand why a pull parser needs this feature. > > If nobody knows why it'd be useful then let's just omit it for now. > All we need to do is document the fact that the combination of > features is not supported. Someone who actually needs the feature > will be a better judge of how it should be implemented.
OK, thank you. I'm going to incorporate all the changes we've discussed so far and post a patch to this list. Thanks, Bob Rossi
