Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you like the name yypushparse ()?
Sounds good to me. > How should I handle the %parse-param option in %push-parser mode? Should > the yyparse () function and the yypushparse () function both accept the > %parse-param arguments? Sorry, I don't understand the issue well, but if both kinds of parsers are likely to want to accept user-defined arguments in order to do their work, then I suppose they'll both need to support %parse-param similarly. If you think it unlikely that a push parser would ever need to have %parse-param, then you can instead cause an error message to be generated if %parse-param is specified with a push parser; we can add the feature later if it turns out we were wrong.
