On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Hans Aberg wrote: > Or vice versa: choosing a Unicode representation makes ASCII unnecessary, > ecept for those poor guys that do not have an UTF-8 editor. But then for this > latter, one might make separate Unicode-ASCII translators.
If the ASCII looks fine and is necessary anyway, why bother with Unicode? > > Second, I don't see how this addresses the issue > > we're discussing anyway: names for semantic values and locations. > > Overuse of tokens may cause grammar conflicts. That sounds nice in general, but I don't see a solution to our problem developing. > It has popped up from time in Help-Bison, and the last time Akim seemed to be > interested If you're referring to the discussion in March, I see that he asked how it would work, which I still don't understand. I saw no expression of interest afterwards. Did I miss a message?
