On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Hans Aberg wrote: > On 22 Nov 2006, at 20:22, Joel E. Denny wrote: > > > > You insist on using "( )", etc. > > > > I'm not insisting. However, no one has proposed an alternative that > > works. > > I think it is a tricky question. I would not want to rush ahead with it.
For the record, we've been discussing these issues off and on for roughly a year now. The named value discussion appears to have started at least several years before that. I wasn't working on Bison then though. > > As far as I can tell, you have agreed that there are problems with > > "exp.sum", "exp/sum", and "sum:exp". > > No. Only the last one. You claimed there were some tokenization problems with > the first two, but I didn't see it. I'm guessing it'll come up as I catch Paul up, so I'll explain it again then.
