On 22 Nov 2006, at 20:22, Joel E. Denny wrote:
You insist on using "( )", etc.
I'm not insisting. However, no one has proposed an alternative that
works.
I think it is a tricky question. I would not want to rush ahead with it.
As far as I can tell, you have agreed that there are problems with
"exp.sum", "exp/sum", and "sum:exp".
No. Only the last one. You claimed there were some tokenization
problems with the first two, but I didn't see it.
You keep suggesting Unicode but you
won't make a specific proposal other than something related to "-
>", which
is not what we're talking about.
One would throw them in at need, when sitting down, trying to
compiled the grammar.
Hans Aberg
