On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:01 PM, David Jeske <[email protected]> wrote:
> The way I was trying to bring Rust into this (but failed), was to point > out that I think the need for (b) is a bit of what caused them to > (eronously) remove their GC -- because they wanted libraries to be built > which did not require GC. > What kinds of libraries were they interested in where GC was a concern? shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
