On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Ben Kloosterman <[email protected]>wrote:
> ** ** > > I'm not forking Rust. They've made too many design choices and > implementation choices that I think won't work.**** > > ** ** > > And yes, if I did, I would actively remove Rust's current pointer > mechanisms. At present, they are poorly designed and framed, which is > causing so much confusion that even the Rust team is making bad decisions > grounded in that confusion.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Agree on some of their design decisions, but it is an almost v1 system > that is a huge + .. It is easier to change some of these mechanism than > build a whole new eco system > That's not at all clear, given the distance between Rust and the language I want. > While I like .NET , I really don’t think you will get much traction from > existing C and C++ devs with a GC on .NET and mono is worse ... > .NET certainly is not a final or sole target. It's just a handy runtime for early bringup.
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
