And it's obvious how a size cap would interfere with such a QoS scheme. Miners 
wouldn't be able to deliver the below guarantees if they have to start 
excluding transactions.



> On Jul 24, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Jean-Paul Kogelman via bitcoin-dev 
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> Quality of service as in:
> 
>> X satoshi / kb = included in block currently worked on;
> 
>> Y satoshi / kb = included in next block;
> 
>> Z satoshi / kb = included in block after that, etc.
> 
> Block count starts when transaction is first seen. Miners can set X, Y, Z. 
> 
> Market develops when miners start setting different values and adding more 
> transactions to blocks as opposed to other miners with higher settings. 
> 
> It basically comes down to the miners themselves if they want a healthy fee 
> market. If they stick to their guns, their influence on the fees will be 
> proportional to their hashing power.
> 
> jp
> 
>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Eric Lombrozo <elombr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 23, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogel...@me.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> You are not going to get a fair fee market if your only form of enforcement 
>>> is the threat of exclusion.
>>> 
>>> A more fair fee market will develop if miners start offering quality of 
>>> service, preferably at multiple tiers. At that point any interference from 
>>> a block size cap will only be detrimental. In fact it will only highlight 
>>> what the cap is actually for; to prevent monster blocks.
>>> 
>>> Add better QoS tools for miners and extend the cap (when possible) and 
>>> there's your fee market.
>>> 
>>> jp
>> 
>> Not sure what you mean by QoS here. Either your transaction is included or 
>> it isn’t. It’s not like you can upgrade to a master suite with a view or 
>> anything.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to