On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 2:54:16 AM Toby Padilla wrote: > Luke - As stated in the Github thread, I totally understand where you're > coming from but the fact is people *will* encode data on the blockchain > using worse methods. For all of the reasons that OP_RETURN was a good idea > in the first place, it's a good idea to support it in PaymentRequests.
As I explained, none of those reasons apply to PaymentRequests. > As for keyless - there's no way (that I know of) to construct a transaction > with a zero value OP_RETURN in an environment without keys since the > Payment Protocol is what defines the method for getting a transaction from > a server to a wallet. You can make a custom transaction and execute it in > the same application but without Payments there's no way to move > transactions between two applications. You need to build the transaction > where you execute it and thus need a key. I have no idea what you are trying to say here. Luke _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
