On Tuesday, January 26, 2016 3:17:12 AM Toby Padilla wrote: > I don't think every application of OP_RETURN could be classified as "spam".
Perhaps not, but in this context I cannot think of any non-spam use cases. Use cases should come before changes to support them. > I also don't think burning the value is going to dissuade anyone from going > down that route. I don't think lost value is better for anyone. Lost value is better because it has a cost to the spammer, and deflates the rest of the bitcoins. Luke _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev