On Wednesday, June 08, 2016 8:23:51 AM Johnson Lau wrote: > If someday 32 bytes hash is deemed to be unsafe, the txid would also be > unsafe and a hard fork might be needed. Therefore, I don’t see how a > witness program larger than 40 bytes would be useful in any case (as it is > more expensive and takes more UTXO space). I think Pieter doesn’t want to > make it unnecessarily lenient.
There is no harm in being lenient, but it limits the ability to do softfork upgrades in the future. I appreciate Pieter's concern that we'd need to do more development and testing to go to this extreme, which is why I am only asking the limit raised to 75 bytes. Luke _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
