---- On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 02:54:04 +0800 Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote ----
> Honestly, if the reason for the too-short-for-safety timespan is that you
> want to use BIP9, then please take a step back and realize that SegWit is a
> contriversial soft-fork that needs to be deployed in a way that is extra
> safe because you can't roll the feature back a week after deployment.
> All transactions that were made in the mean time turn into everyone-can-
> spent transactions.
No one should use, nor anyone is advised to use, segwit transactions before it
is fully activated. Having 2 months or 2 weeks of grace period makes totally no
difference in this regard. If anyone tried to use segwit tx during your
proposed 2 months grace period, all those txs were still everyone-can-spent.
All you are advocating is just stalling the process with no improvement in
security.
>
> I stand by the minimum of 2 months. There is no reason to use BIP9 as it was
>
> coded in an older client. That is an excuse that I don't buy.
> --
> Tom Zander
> Blog: https://zander.github.io
> Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
