Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhaps to bitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have taken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under contentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is for the discussion of new ideas and proposals.
Much appreciated. Thanks. On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of > > full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone > > were to control a majority of full nodes > > The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If > this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply > spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost. > > e > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
