Its too bad you're not the one who decides what gets posted here or not. If you don't like whats being discussed, then don't open those emails.
On 1/7/17, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhaps to > bitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have > taken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under > contentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is > for the discussion of new ideas and proposals. > > Much appreciated. Thanks. > > On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote: >> > Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of >> > full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone >> > were to control a majority of full nodes >> >> The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If >> this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply >> spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost. >> >> e >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bitcoin-dev mailing list >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
