That's BIP30, he linked BIP34: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L3004
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Can you tell me where it is enforced? > > The only place I found was here; > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/validation.cpp#L1793 > > which doesn’t enforce it, all that code does is check that the txid is > unknown or fully spent. > And since the below idea from Russel would change the txid, it would seem > no > full client would reject this. > > Maybe its in a BIP, but I can’t find it in the code. > > On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 16:59:12 CEST James Hilliard wrote: > > It is a consensus rule > > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0034.mediawiki > > > > On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Tom Zander via bitcoin-dev > > > > <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > On Sunday, 2 April 2017 22:39:13 CEST Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev > > > > > > wrote: > > >> Someone told me a while back that it would be more natural if we move > > >> the > > >> > > >> nHeight from the coinbase script to the coinbase locktime. Have you > > >> considered doing this? > > > > > > That change would not be a consensus change and thus free to make any > > > day. > > > -- > Tom Zander > Blog: https://zander.github.io > Vlog: https://vimeo.com/channels/tomscryptochannel > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
