But in prnciple I don't oppose to making it stardard, just want to understand what's the point.
On Thu, 10 May 2018, 02:16 Jorge Timón, <jti...@jtimon.cc> wrote: > I fail to see what's the practical difference between sending to op_true > and giving the coins are fees directly. Perhaps it is ao obvious to you > that you forget to mention it? > If you did I honestlt missed it. > > On Wed, 9 May 2018, 01:58 Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev, < > firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The largest problem we are having today with the lightning >> protocol is trying to predict future fees. Eltoo solves this elegantly, >> but meanwhile we would like to include a 546 satoshi OP_TRUE output in >> commitment transactions so that we use minimal fees and then use CPFP >> (which can't be done at the moment due to CSV delays on outputs). >> >> Unfortunately, we'd have to P2SH it at the moment as a raw 'OP_TRUE' is >> non-standard. Are there any reasons not to suggest such a policy >> change? >> >> Thanks! >> Rusty. >> _______________________________________________ >> bitcoin-dev mailing list >> email@example.com >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >> >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev