Ah, ok. I've worked with the non-BIP39 Electrum mnemonics, which have this behaviour, but haven't tried the BIP39 support within it.
Thanks, -Neill. On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:05:50PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > Nope. > > This is how Electrum treats BIP39 restoring as well, try it out. > > -Jon > > 2018年11月16日(金) 23:04、Neill Miller さん（nei...@thecodefactory.org）のメッセージ: > > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:17:30PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood via > > bitcoin-dev wrote: > > > If more apps would implement to the word of the BIP39 spec, multiple > > > languages make sense, but since reality is no one follows the spec (/the > > > spec is way too open to interpretation) then expecting every app to load > > > every language is unreasonable. > > > > > > Electrum actually handles BIP39 recovery the way the BIP specifies. I can > > > restore random strings if I want, and it warns me, and I can ignore it > > if I > > > wish. > > > > Electrum mnemonics are not based on BIP39, which is why it can do > > this. > > > > -Neill. > > > > _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
