В Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:19:41 +0900 Jonathan Underwood <junderw...@bitcoinbank.co.jp> wrote:
> > Other note: you have 'unused' value of 1 for `m` in your scheme, why > > not require m=1 for single-sig case, and use 0 as indicator that > > there are a serlal number following it? > > > > 0x00 is single sig, aka, OP_CHECKSIG > > 0x01 is multisig, aka, 1-of-3, 1-of-2 OP_CHECKMULTISIG This informatin is available in per-output redeem/witness script, signer will be able to distinguish between multisig/single-sig by looking at this script. I think it only need to know the total number of keys participating in the signing, and check that this number matches the particulars of redeem/witness script. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
