As there has been some feedback to the same effect, I've opened a competing PR for separate evaluation here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26398
Please give feedback if anyone has any. On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 8:13 PM Peter Todd <p...@petertodd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:07:54PM -0400, Greg Sanders wrote: > > I don't doubt the use case(it's why I opened the issue!). I didn't want > the > > proposal to die in case people found it odd that 61, 62, 63, but not 64 > > bytes ended up being broadcast able. > > > > Perhaps this is not an issue, especially since this isn't a consensus > > change like the Great Consensus Cleanup. Willing to change my proposal > and > > PR if people have no strong objections. > > I think it's fine if we only restrict 64 bytes. We have a specific reason > to do > that and it's ok if we just tell people that. Only fairly-technical > use-cases > are affected anyway. > > -- > https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
