On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Adam Back <a...@cypherspace.org> wrote: > d) some new standardized spend to fees (only miners can claim).
> so if I understand what you proposed d) seems like a useful concept if that > is not currently possible. eg alternatively could we not just propose a > standard recognized address that clearly no-one knows the EC discrete log > of? I'm one of the people experimenting in this area. I've long argued that a zero-output transaction should be permitted -- 100% miner fee -- as an elegant proof of sacrifice. Unfortunately that requires a hard fork. Also, for most people, it seems likely that a change transaction would be generated. That, then, would generate an already-standard transaction, where inputs > outputs. -- Jeff Garzik Senior Software Engineer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services 3. A single system of record for all IT processes http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
