Lorin, get off on your bad self!  An EXCELLENT summary.  Thanks.

E

On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Lorin wrote:

> > Came across the posting below on a local job board.  It's interesting
> > to see the same issues from blue collar labor unions concerned about
>
> Even the blue collar labor unions are modifying their anti-immigrant
> stances.  With the reality that a huge percentage of manual labor
> positions are, and will continue to be filled by immigrants, many of the
> larger unions are now recruiting heavily among mexican and south-east
> asian american communities.
>
> The rationale is that improving having the union workers and the immigrant
> workers at each others throats only helps the big corporations who can
> play them off against each other.  Representing both local and immigrant
> groups gives unions much more power.
>
> The other reality is that union memberships within the US are fairly
> stagnant, and much like the corporations they are supposedly fighting,
> they have to continue to grow to survive.  A massive pool of millions of
> unrepresented workers pretty enticing.
>
> > foreign labor coming up in the high tech sector.  Rather than
> > exporting the work as the manufacturing sector does to the third
> > world, the high tech sector imports its cheap labor.  I wonder why
>
> As in other sectors, they do both.  Ask anyone who works for a development
> firm if they've ever lost a bid to India, Maylasia, or Thailand.
>
> > that is.  Perhaps because the tech workers are paid a living wage,
> > they can afford to live in the U.S. and spend their earnings here,
> > whereas as a third world factory worker could not afford to live here
> > on what they make.
>
> > Or maybe it's more important for high tech labor to be close to the
> > heart of things.  This brings up again a paradox of the high tech
>
> A large amount of them send their wages back to their homelands to support
> their families.  But that wasn't really your point.
>
>
> As to why they bring workers here, rather than export labor, i think
> it is just the first step.  There is a fair amount of infrastructure
> needed to support a large tech sector that is still growing in third world
> countries.  Things like access to computers, fast internet connections,
> and stable electricity.  As those things have improved, more and more jobs
> are being transferred overseas.  I don't think there's anything intrinsic
> about the tech sector that prevents it from being exported.  It's
> certainly easier to ship code than cars.
>
> > valley.  Why are Nike and the Gap happy to ship their factories
> > abroad, but big information technology players like HP concentrating
> > their workforce in pricey Santa Clara?
> >
> HP is a distinct case in that they have until recently been reputed to be
> an excellent place to work.  They treated their employees very well, had a
> low turnover, etc.  So they are not really indicative of the whole
> industry.  Most chips are fab'ed in Asia, Apple, Dell and everyone else,
> has their laptops assembled in China or Thailand.  In fact i think most
> hardware in general is produced in Asia, but i could be wrong.
>
> As for the article, i really hate these 'close the door' mindsets.  Indian
> and russian programmers are losing their jobs too, and it sucks even worse
> for them.  You can't collect unemployment, you definately can't get a new
> job, i mean who's gonna shell out $1,000 for a new H1-B application for
> you when they might have to lay you off in 3-4 months?
>
> A lot of these guys have been living here for years, and have homes and
> families here, in addition to supporting relatives in their home
> countries.  Now they have to pick up and leave, and try to find a job
> under way worse conditions than California.  I've talked to dudes who were
> only a couple of months away from getting their citizenships.
>
> I get annoyed at people who feel they have a more intrisic right to work,
> just because they're grandfather immigrated here instead of their father.
> The problem is not how many H1-b visas are alowed in, it is that companies
> are allowed to pay them less, and work them harder in the same jobs.
>
> If people of the same skill level, were payed the same regardless of
> background, there wouldn't be a huge desire to import foreign labor.  So
> in a sense, the problem is not unique to the Tech industry, and is in fact
> the same problem the blue collar unions are facing.  The only difference
> is the Blue collar guys are finally beginning to stop blaming the only
> people poorer than them.
>
> -Lkb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bits mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits
>

-- 
Erik Curiel
almost web-engineer/would-be philosopher

"The affairs of human beings are not worthy of great seriousness,
and yet we must take them seriously."
                                ---Plato, *The Laws*



_______________________________________________
Bits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sugoi.org/mailman/listinfo/bits

Reply via email to