I second this David, I have clients on rogers that can not access there
emails using webmail on my servers because rogers blocks there ports. A
quick port scan on there end confirms this.
It took me some time to figure out what was going on, after I design there
site complete the job I get complaints that they can not access there emails
from home. This only happens with rogers and 4 clients later with the same
problem, lead to the port scan. I do not know how wide spread this is but it
happens in the north end here.

On a side note I had 2 friends contact me for help, because rogers
disconnected there service stating that they had a virus on there computer
and they will not re-activate it until the virus was removed. This caused a
problem for them because they could not download a new virus detector or
upgrade there current software without being connected to the internet.

I must say I had my first cell phone in 1997 from rogers and that was not
fun, lots of billing issues and crazy customer service. I lasted one year
before canceling. I have not had any service / products from rogers since
then.

I see not much has changed in 10 years.

On Nov 22, 2007 6:54 AM, David Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I, on the other hand, have had major issues with Rogers and found their
> support staff to be useless. Any client on their "99." Network randomly
> loses routing to my servers for days at a time but they can get to other
> places on the internet just fine. If you fish around a bit they will find
> other places on the internet they can't get to but I look pretty stupid to
> my clients trying to tell them it is Rogers problem when to them, I'm the
> only place they can't get to.
>
> I think their speed is great but when something goes wrong they have
> extremely poor ability to support their products. (Opinion based on many
> more issues than just the one above).
>
> I personally have been on Sentex DSL for about 8 years now. Also had good
> luck with clients on Execulink. Although they have not been perfect, they
> have been quite good over that time. ... and in this market, "good" is
> very
> complimentary.
>
> - dbc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Mariotti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November-21-07 10:56 PM
> To: 'Keith Major | Aquarius Telecom Inc.'; '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: [biz] Bell Internet Traffic Shaping
>
> I've gone through a number of DSL providers. Even paying a super premium
> for
> non-login accounts, highest speed possible, 128 IPs, and premium support.
>
> They have been good, but as with anything, it's when problems arise that I
> have experienced major issues.
>
> I started with DSL.ca, which was bought out by WizNet.ca, blah, blah,
>  which
> was bought by Primus. Apparently, Bell audited their lines, saw that mine
> had no "paper work" and pulled the plug. I was down for 5 days and lost a
> significant contract because of it. I ended up cancelling everything and
> moving to a data center for my important stuff. The support staff were
> useless... completely at the mercy of Bell apparently.
>
> I was getting tired of paying Bell for basic services so a few months
> back,
> Primus sent me a great package offer of telephone, Long Distance and DSL
> which I couldn't pass up. I signed up. Within a week or two, my telephone
> line was switched over to Primus. But getting DSL was painful. After
> several
> weeks of playing games on the phone with Primus including everything
> getting
> 'accidently disconnected' for over a day, I cancelled the installation
> before it was all complete. Again, support staff useless... blaming it on
> Bell again...
>
> What I found in all of these cases was that I wasn't dealing with the
> company in charge. Clearly, it didn't matter how great a company it was
> that
> you cut the cheque to, Bell was ultimately in charge and every support
> issue
> they pushed to Bell took VERY long to get resolved (days). I constantly
> ran
> into excuses upon excuses indicating that it was Bell at fault or that
> they
> were working on fixing it. I do think both parties are at fault for the
> mess
> created.
>
> I have never had a good experience with Bell directly or indirectly. No
> matter who I paid.
>
> I signed up with Rogers last week. Both Home Phone and High-Speed. I
> called,
> they gave me great pricing, packages, promos... They scheduled an install
> within 3 days, I called to make a minor alteration to what I ordered and
> they said they'd be there in the morning instead (less than 12 hours
> ordering). They did a complete cable install (from the pole). Hooked up my
> high-speed AND Home Phone... I had a minor problem, someone was there to
> fix
> it in the afternoon... and it has been working without a  problem since.
> Great service. Great speeds. Support has been quick.
>
> Similarly, a friend had a truck scrape the wall of the building he was in,
> and it ripped off all the lines on the side. Rogers was there in the
> morning
> fixing it. Bell took 3 days plus a weekend.
>
> In my view, I think Roger's technical staffing is far better than any that
> I
> have experienced. And that alone, is worth switching to them. Performance
> wise, it's the fastest I've ever seen thus far.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chuck M
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Major | Aquarius Telecom Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: November-21-07 9:41 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [biz] Bell Internet Traffic Shaping
>
> Looks like the rodents at Bell are gnawing on the internet service.
>
>
>
> Last week, I visited a neighbour to look at their computer and found the
> Bell internet performance quite poor; some images/pages not loading and
> streaming video was poor and choppy.  I found it strange that they were
> getting over 2.4 megs download on the HYPERLINK
> "http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/"http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/
> speakeasy speed test and the actual web surfing experience on their new
> computer was poor.
>
>
>
> At home, I have a 4 meg account, and started noticing similar things
> Monday
> evening.  I did a speed test and found something interesting.  Whilst the
> speed test is underway, I can see the speed increase to 3 megs then drop
> down to under 1.6 megs - similar to a driving instructor slowing the
> student
> driver during a lesson (they have their own brake pedal on the passenger
> side) followed by an increase in speed again.  Upload speed in all tests
> remain constant above 660kbps.
>
>
>
> My goal is to leave Bell completely at this point so, Bell resellers will
> not be considered.
>
>
>
> Does anyone have suggestions/recommendations for residential DSL service?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.1/1141 - Release Date:
> 20/11/2007
> 11:34 AM
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
416 Solutions
Office: 416-850-2603
Toll free: 877-318-6489
www.416solutions.com

Reply via email to