On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Jon Pennington wrote:
> alea miras wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:16:55 +0200 Mads Martin
> Joergensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > IMHO - it's completely in the Blackbox spirit. If you do not want
> > > keystroke support, you can turn it off. It keeps BB from beeing bloated,
> > > and it gives you the freedom to choose.
> >
> > The same effect could be achived by a simple compile option e.g.
> ./configure --with-no-shortcuts
>
> No, it couldn't. It's effective, yes, but not allowed for in the ICCCM
> specification.
I would have to agree with Alea -- installing an additional key handler
contradicts my minimalist needs. I believe that most users (maybe all) use
their keyboard to manage the windows.
I believe users should be able to decide if they fully want to follow the
"Inter-Client Communication Conventions Manual" specification. I think
that options should be considered:
./configure --break-ICCMP --enable-key-handling
Nevertheless, I do like how bbkeys has any easy-to-use interface for
configurations.
Jeremy C. Reed
http://www.reedmedia.net/
http://bsd.reedmedia.net/
