re, all. Actually, I (erm, author of bbkeys) will agree with Cameron on
this. bbkeys shouldn't be dependent on qt. I also think that bbkeysconf and
bbkeys should be separated into two distinct packages--and that a "strong
suggestion" or whatever the debian term is should be set up between
bbkeysconf and bbkeys. In fact, on the bbkeys home page
(http://movingparts.net/bbkeys.shtml), I've separated the two myself. I also
run debian (until FreeBSD gets IrDA working *taunt* *poke* *nudge*) and
whenever I release a new version of bbkeys, I also package a .deb of it. I've
not changed bbkeysconf in a long time, so I don't have a .deb handy for that
bugger, but there is an RPM of it up there and you can always do "alien -i"
on it....
On Thursday 25 January 2001 23:36, Cameron wrote:
> Sean and others,
> I just made the leap from Mandrake to Debian, and now have blackbox
> almost how I like it again--except for one thing: no bbkeys.
>
> I didn't install bbkeys because it depends on qt, which i don't want
> installed. Could you PLEASE package bbkeys and bbkeysconf separately?
> bbkeys can easily be configured manually and should not depend on
> bbkeysconf, though I would strongly suggest it to general users.
>
> I'm going to download the src deb and hopefully build a clean (no
> bbkeysconf) bbkeys deb for myself. Please save me some future grief and
> separate bbkeysconf from the bbkeys deb. Thanks
--
¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤
Jason Kasper (vanRijn)
Systems Engineer
bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
VORFA
