On 26-Jan-2001 vanRijn wrote:
> re, all. Actually, I (erm, author of bbkeys) will agree with Cameron on
> this. bbkeys shouldn't be dependent on qt. I also think that bbkeysconf and
> bbkeys should be separated into two distinct packages--and that a "strong
> suggestion" or whatever the debian term is should be set up between
> bbkeysconf and bbkeys. In fact, on the bbkeys home page
> (http://movingparts.net/bbkeys.shtml), I've separated the two myself. I also
> run debian (until FreeBSD gets IrDA working *taunt* *poke* *nudge*) and
> whenever I release a new version of bbkeys, I also package a .deb of it. I've
> not changed bbkeysconf in a long time, so I don't have a .deb handy for that
> bugger, but there is an RPM of it up there and you can always do "alien -i"
> on it....
>
make bbkeys do something useful when the key is clicked and the gui tool is not
installed and I will gladly remove the qt depends.
