Cool... and you're referring to Enlightenment, correct? DC
On Mon, Oct29,01 11:53, Igor Pruchanskiy wrote: > One of the guys on IRC just told me that E developers claim E17 be faster > then BB... > > > The internals are very much a state machine, much like Evas is. This means > that all the work is only done in idle time - avoiding useless processing > while E17 is busy handling a large stream of incoming events. The code has > been optimized from the design standpoint - not the "save a comparison > here and there" point. This has meant HUGE speedups. So far E17 is showing > itself to be more responsive and faster than all WM's I've tested it > against (this includes Blackbox, twm, fvwm, fvwm2, Windowmaker, mwm, and > Sawfish). Admittedly E17 isn't hellishly lean on memory usage - but the > design goal here is sheer speed, aesthetics, and user friendliness and > responsiveness, whilst pushing the bleeding edge a little further along, > and providing new exciting ideas for users to feast on. E17 should run > just fine - if not snappily, even on a low end machine, as long as you are > not too short on memory. > > You can find the full article here: > http://www.ny.us.rasterman.com/pages/e.html > > igor > > -- > Uptime : 57 days, 13:08 -- Derek Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] "All men by nature desire to know." -- Aristotle.
