> I rather use BB, as BB has the goal and idea of being fast.. Couldn't u > implement something > really .. er.. cool as soon as possible, showing the opposite? >
flux gives you integrated keybindings and icons listed in the toolbar. Other than that the code is basically the same. So if you want those, use flux. > Something visual perhaps? Is there to much to ask if I say I want a > small fake-transparent shadow around all borders? Windows, menues, etc.. > I really like BB for the speed and the fact that I haven't found any > other wm that gives me > such fast workingenvirenment.. > speed comes by removing fluff. fake transparency is not cheap. It is not that hard to add, so if you want it, make your own jesperbox. Each feature costs. Think of the story of the man who asked to be paid by a Chinese emperor one grain of rice per day, doubled every day. At the end of the month he owuld have more rice than the emperor. This is similar to the effect of adding features. Each one costs a little and eventually you are eaten alive. > One more thing; Why don't implement bbkeys as it was in old 0.5x.x? > Feels weird to have > bbkeys running along.. =/ > bbkeys does quite a bit and the blackbox author did not have the time, energy, desire to handle it so keybindings were pulled out and other people hacked on the code. There is talk of giving keybindings back to blackbox, will see what the future holds.
