mattias/spikboll wrote: >On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 21:43:57 +0100 Jesper Ljungberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Help! My friends keep telling me how much better Fluxbox is than Blackbox! >>Fluxbox is a Blackbox-remake if anyone wonders.. >>(http://sourceforge.net/projects/fluxbox/) >> >>I rather use BB, as BB has the goal and idea of being fast.. Couldn't u >>implement something >>really .. er.. cool as soon as possible, showing the opposite? >> >>Something visual perhaps? Is there to much to ask if I say I want a >>small fake-transparent shadow around all borders? Windows, menues, etc.. >>I really like BB for the speed and the fact that I haven't found any >>other wm that gives me >>such fast workingenvirenment.. >> > >You do realize how absurd this request is, don't you? > I think I just did ;)
> > >>One more thing; Why don't implement bbkeys as it was in old 0.5x.x? >>Feels weird to have >>bbkeys running along.. =/ >> > >Because not everyone want/need the functions bbkeys (and all the other bbtools) >supply. >And it's much better, from a minimalistic point of view, to have it this way. > I guess you're right.. After all.. I self, have managed to install and use only those tools above bb after my way of working.. I guess that's the typical linux-ideology.. > >>/LogiC (http://ghosthouse.linux.se) >> > > >-- > > mattias �stergren | /"\ > compsci student | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign > g�vle, sweden | X No HTML in e-mail > http://spikboll.net | / \ > > > /LogiC (http://ghosthouse.linux.se)
