Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>>I rather use BB, as BB has the goal and idea of being fast.. Couldn't u
>>implement something
>>really .. er.. cool as soon as possible, showing the opposite?
>>
>
>flux gives you integrated keybindings and icons listed in the toolbar. Other
>than that the code is basically the same. So if you want those, use flux.
>
Nooo.. I think I stay with the one o claims to be just *fast*.. ;)
>
>>Something visual perhaps? Is there to much to ask if I say I want a
>>small fake-transparent shadow around all borders? Windows, menues, etc..
>>I really like BB for the speed and the fact that I haven't found any
>>other wm that gives me
>>such fast workingenvirenment..
>>
>
>speed comes by removing fluff. fake transparency is not cheap. It is not that
>hard to add, so if you want it, make your own jesperbox. Each feature costs.
>Think of the story of the man who asked to be paid by a Chinese emperor one
>grain of rice per day, doubled every day. At the end of the month he owuld
>have more rice than the emperor. This is similar to the effect of adding
>features. Each one costs a little and eventually you are eaten alive.
>
Eaten alive, eh? Sounds like something bad ;) Just wondered. I notice
that you aim at
the "fast"-bit with high accuracy. I fell foolish, asking for fluff,
when I really even
don't want it.. I guess it's one of those "he's got a better bike than
me.. =("-thing.. =)
>
>>One more thing; Why don't implement bbkeys as it was in old 0.5x.x?
>>Feels weird to have
>>bbkeys running along.. =/
>>
>
>bbkeys does quite a bit and the blackbox author did not have the time, energy,
>desire to handle it so keybindings were pulled out and other people hacked on
>the code.
>
>There is talk of giving keybindings back to blackbox, will see what the future
>holds.
>
>
Oki.. Thanx for the update.. Good to se that my favourite-wm still
lives.. =)
/LogiC (http://ghosthouse.linux.se)
