Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[CVS] 

> I do not like it

> Another thing is I have been coding often on my laptop and currently my only
> way to get files from it is via a floppy.  cvs assumes you have a network or
> are willing to patch and commit.

You seem to be missing the point of cvs.  If you kept an up-to-date
repository on sourceforge, you could work on your laptop, copy over the
files to your workstations when you are back to a connected station and
then commit them (or just commit them right away from the laptop).

The next time you go somewhere with or without your laptop, you can get
your sources easily and make changes and commit them, delete the sources
locally and still have your changes the next time you want to work on
them.

> Personally, I would rather people use the tarballs I release.  Frankly the need
> to download code just because it is new has never made sense to me.  Yesterday
> CVS did not even compile.

If it doesn't, the people checking it out might actually make it work.
If somebody wants to stay up to date, a system like CVS (or 'arch' or
'subversion') only makes sense to me.

CVS is not intendend for _releases_ (as that's what appears to be your
beef with it on contrast to tarballs), but rather as a "Concurrent
Versoin System'.

Just my $localCurrency->$smallAmount

-Jan

-- 
finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to