On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:22:24AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > On 07-Feb-2002 David Terrell wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:02:41AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > >> > > >> > Vendor branches don't give you good commit history. > >> > > >> > >> but they do reflect my code and cvs usage. > > > > Are you planning on letting other people commit to the cvs tree > > on sf directly? > > > > not really. xOr may eventually get access. Of course plans change. Nothing > is set in stone. > > Blackbox has never been in CVS before. I use CVS as a safe database for code > storage. If something bad happens, I can always find the releases there. > Granted, this is not a common usage in the open source community. But this is > not a distributed project with 10s or 100s of contributors. If that changes, > perhaps our methods will.
That's cool. When you have multiple developers, my brief tutorial will still be just as relevant. :) -- David Terrell | But remember that "layman" is just a polite [EMAIL PROTECTED] | word for "idiot." http://wwn.nebcorp.com/ | - Neal Stephenson
