* Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Feb 07. 2002 20:24]: > > Are you planning on letting other people commit to the cvs tree > > on sf directly? > > not really. xOr may eventually get access. Of course plans change. Nothing > is set in stone. > > Blackbox has never been in CVS before. I use CVS as a safe database for code > storage. If something bad happens, I can always find the releases there. > Granted, this is not a common usage in the open source community. But this is > not a distributed project with 10s or 100s of contributors. If that changes, > perhaps our methods will.
Lets keep this like the kernel. One guy gets all the patches, and decides what goes in or not. If you write good code for the project, does it then matter if you send the patches to him or put them directly in CVS anyway? -- Mads Martin J�rgensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogic, with just a little bit more effort?" -- A. P. J.
