On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Brian Hechinger wrote: > this looks like it could be very easy to fix, the question is, how do we want > to handle it? sort through the list of depths and pick the highest one? in > the short term, i'll hardcode mine to 24 if need be, so i'll at least have a > working system, but i'd much rather fix it right. > > thoughts? opinions? Brad? Sean? input?
Well .. If all it is picking the depth for is title bars and menus etc, then we probably don't need the highest one. I'd say it should take the smallest one above 8 (or if none > 8 exist, then the highest there is). I assume the reason for providing more depths is that apps can choose a lower depth and conserve resources? That is pure speculation on my part though, I've rather limited knowledge of X windows internals. :-) -James
