Great. I guess the only question for people now is do they want to
continue using a product knowing it will be made obsolete. I'm fine
using a new, leopard compatible build for at least the next year. So
for me, that's a yes.
- Griffin
On Jun 3, 2008, at 9:06 AM, J. Nicholas Jitkoff wrote:
I can release it, mostly we just need people trying it out to see if
it feels ok. I have a few outstanding changes to add quick look, and
I'll need to put those in.
On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:58 AM, Griffin Caprio wrote:
Hi Alcor,
That's great news to hear. Can I ask a couple of questions:
1 ) Who would be in charge of "releasing the branch" as you say?
2 ) What needs to be done in order for the branch to be released?
Documentation? Beta Testing ?
Thanks,
Griffin Caprio
On Jun 3, 2008, at 8:03 AM, AIcor wrote:
On Jun 2, 11:14 am, "Mark Wilden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This sounds like a Big Bang rearchitecture that is so rarely
successful.
Quite likely to come true.
At this point I'd like to make a recommendation:
It is probably better to just release the branch. It is actually
quite
close to being ready. With QuickLook and some of the bug fixes,
would
be substantially better than the current release.
I don't want to encourage too much work on QS because (shortly) I
intend to make it obsolete, but giving users something that will
work
for the next year is certainly worthwhile.
I'm working on a separate proj
