w00t! When Alcor talks it's like "The Alcor has spoken". So please, who will be releasing the update and when?
On Jun 3, 8:53 pm, chris n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this is great news to hear. I would also like to know if ankur's > updates will be merged. > > Alcor, care to elaborate a tad on the new project? > > On Jun 3, 7:30 am, Griffin Caprio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Wow, that's great to hear. > > > In the mean time, i'd be all for testing a new build of the branch. > > Any idea on if Ankur's changed would be merged in? > > > - Griffin > > > On Jun 3, 2008, at 9:17 AM, J. Nicholas Jitkoff wrote: > > > > I'll have something better for you by the time Leopard is done for. > > > > On Jun 3, 2008, at 7:10 AM, Griffin Caprio wrote: > > > >> Great. I guess the only question for people now is do they want to > > >> continue using a product knowing it will be made obsolete. I'm > > >> fine using a new, leopard compatible build for at least the next > > >> year. So for me, that's a yes. > > > >> - Griffin > > >> On Jun 3, 2008, at 9:06 AM, J. Nicholas Jitkoff wrote: > > > >>> I can release it, mostly we just need people trying it out to see > > >>> if it feels ok. I have a few outstanding changes to add quick > > >>> look, and I'll need to put those in. > > > >>> On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:58 AM, Griffin Caprio wrote: > > > >>>> Hi Alcor, > > > >>>> That's great news to hear. Can I ask a couple of questions: > > > >>>> 1 ) Who would be in charge of "releasing the branch" as you say? > > >>>> 2 ) What needs to be done in order for the branch to be > > >>>> released? Documentation? Beta Testing ? > > > >>>> Thanks, > > >>>> Griffin Caprio > > > >>>> On Jun 3, 2008, at 8:03 AM, AIcor wrote: > > > >>>>> On Jun 2, 11:14 am, "Mark Wilden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>>> This sounds like a Big Bang rearchitecture that is so rarely > > >>>>>> successful. > > > >>>>> Quite likely to come true. > > > >>>>> At this point I'd like to make a recommendation: > > > >>>>> It is probably better to just release the branch. It is actually > > >>>>> quite > > >>>>> close to being ready. With QuickLook and some of the bug fixes, > > >>>>> would > > >>>>> be substantially better than the current release. > > > >>>>> I don't want to encourage too much work on QS because (shortly) I > > >>>>> intend to make it obsolete, but giving users something that will > > >>>>> work > > >>>>> for the next year is certainly worthwhile. > > > >>>>> I'm working on a separate proj
