this is great news to hear. I would also like to know if ankur's updates will be merged.
Alcor, care to elaborate a tad on the new project? On Jun 3, 7:30 am, Griffin Caprio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow, that's great to hear. > > In the mean time, i'd be all for testing a new build of the branch. > Any idea on if Ankur's changed would be merged in? > > - Griffin > > On Jun 3, 2008, at 9:17 AM, J. Nicholas Jitkoff wrote: > > > I'll have something better for you by the time Leopard is done for. > > > On Jun 3, 2008, at 7:10 AM, Griffin Caprio wrote: > > >> Great. I guess the only question for people now is do they want to > >> continue using a product knowing it will be made obsolete. I'm > >> fine using a new, leopard compatible build for at least the next > >> year. So for me, that's a yes. > > >> - Griffin > >> On Jun 3, 2008, at 9:06 AM, J. Nicholas Jitkoff wrote: > > >>> I can release it, mostly we just need people trying it out to see > >>> if it feels ok. I have a few outstanding changes to add quick > >>> look, and I'll need to put those in. > > >>> On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:58 AM, Griffin Caprio wrote: > > >>>> Hi Alcor, > > >>>> That's great news to hear. Can I ask a couple of questions: > > >>>> 1 ) Who would be in charge of "releasing the branch" as you say? > >>>> 2 ) What needs to be done in order for the branch to be > >>>> released? Documentation? Beta Testing ? > > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Griffin Caprio > > >>>> On Jun 3, 2008, at 8:03 AM, AIcor wrote: > > >>>>> On Jun 2, 11:14 am, "Mark Wilden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>>> This sounds like a Big Bang rearchitecture that is so rarely > >>>>>> successful. > > >>>>> Quite likely to come true. > > >>>>> At this point I'd like to make a recommendation: > > >>>>> It is probably better to just release the branch. It is actually > >>>>> quite > >>>>> close to being ready. With QuickLook and some of the bug fixes, > >>>>> would > >>>>> be substantially better than the current release. > > >>>>> I don't want to encourage too much work on QS because (shortly) I > >>>>> intend to make it obsolete, but giving users something that will > >>>>> work > >>>>> for the next year is certainly worthwhile. > > >>>>> I'm working on a separate proj
