Yeah, don't get me wrong! I'm grateful to all the support I can get, and I'm not trying to undermine Alcor (or Google :P ) in any way. I just think that there may be a better solution. If there's enough response to this topic (and if Alcor is happy), I'm sure we can come up with something.
On Jun 8, 8:14 am, Ty Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to say that I think Google Groups is probably the worst > communal communications tool I've ever used. However, I'm not the guy > in charge and I'm just happy to have any quicksilver community at all. > > Ty > > On Jun 8, 2008, at 3:11 AM, Patrick wrote: > > > > > Well, this has just made me hate Google Groups even more :P > > It just claimed this post 'didn't exist', and I've just been told ' > > Discussions aren't available right now. We're sorry. Try again > > shortly. ' > > Not true! :S > > > On Jun 8, 8:08 am, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Well, > >> After posting around here for a while, I've recently seen how > >> limiting > >> Google's Groups can be. > >> I wasn't able to upload a file, and I also wasn't able to write this > >> post in the ' The forum is dead. Long live the forum... er... group. > >> ' topic (anybody know why?) > > >> I was just wondering if everybody else is happy with Google Groups, > >> or > >> whether anybody has any alternatives? > >> I have a feeling the Group may be harming Quicksilver's image. I've > >> replied to countless posts over at macrumors.com about quicksilver, > >> trying to help and directing them to post here, only to get the > >> answer > >> that 'the Group is dead' or something similar. > > >> If we're all happy with the Group, then that's fine. If not then I > >> (and I'm sure other people would be to) am happy to set up a support > >> forum running a more user-friendly software (phpbb?) which might make > >> life a bit easier. > > >> What's everybody's thoughts?
