Something interesting I came across today, in the ARC FAQ docs under 'Is ARC Slow?':
> One issue to be aware of is that the optimizer is not run in common debug configurations, so expect to see a lot more retain/release traffic at -O0than at -Os. Not sure if that would make a difference to actual crashes, but it could do. I rarely build/test in release configs, and it's probably something we should do. On Thursday, 23 January 2014 05:30:11 UTC+8, 1.61803 wrote: > > User clarkewd commented in > #1754<https://github.com/quicksilver/Quicksilver/issues/1754#issuecomment-33056913> > > I didn't get much of a positive response so decided to build QS myself and >> comment out the crash reporter part of it - the spillover benefit that I >> found is that if you build QS on your own system as opposed to downloading >> a pre-compiled version it seems to crash a lot less. I think this also >> explains why none of the developers seem to notice the random crashes as >> much as the users do. > > > Can the devs confirm, explain or dismiss this observation regarding > compiling QS? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quicksilver" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blacktree-quicksilver. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
