Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/24/06 15:07 CST: > They're in release mode for 2.1.22. I don't know the ETA, but they've > checked in a few bug fixes like the ones I mentioned in the past > couple days. I don't know if it'll be ready and tested by BLFS-6.2, > but it would be nice. 2.1.21 is working for me with the patches, > though.
I think (personal opinion) it is unwise to try to include a security related package that hasn't seen a release in a year (that gives lots of time for things to have changed in CVS) in the upcoming BLFS version. Would it really gain us anything, other than the uncertainty that stuff might be broken 3-6 months from now? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 15:12:00 up 30 days, 2:49, 1 user, load average: 0.36, 0.43, 0.25 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-book FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
