DJ Lucas wrote these words on 03/20/05 21:49 CST: > Cool. Thanks Randy. I'll look about the archives a bit, but it really > looks bad IMO. I'm still looking for opinions.
I guess I'm confused as to what you mean. What looks bad? The comment is in there because our target is LFS-6.0, so there's a comment in there to help folks that want to render our target version. Or, am I confused as too what you're talking about? -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 21:59:02 up 18 days, 8:03, 4 users, load average: 0.16, 0.08, 0.04 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
